Issue
When compiling the code below with the Java compiler from OpenJDK 8, the call to foo()
is done via an invokespecial
, but when OpenJDK 11 is used, an invokevirtual
is emitted.
public class Invoke {
public void call() {
foo();
}
private void foo() {}
}
Output of javap -v -p
when javac
1.8.0_282 is used:
public void call();
descriptor: ()V
flags: (0x0001) ACC_PUBLIC
Code:
stack=1, locals=1, args_size=1
0: aload_0
1: invokespecial #2 // Method foo:()V
4: return
Output of javap -v -p
when javac
11.0.10 is used:
public void call();
descriptor: ()V
flags: (0x0001) ACC_PUBLIC
Code:
stack=1, locals=1, args_size=1
0: aload_0
1: invokevirtual #2 // Method foo:()V
4: return
I don't get why invokevirtual
is used here since there cannot be an override of foo()
.
After digging a bit it seems that the purpose of invokevirtual
on private methods is to allow nested classes to call private methods from the outer class. So I tried the code below:
public class Test{
public static void main(String[] args) {
// Build a Derived such that Derived.getValue()
// somewhat "exists".
System.out.println(new Derived().foo());
}
public static class Base {
public int foo() {
return getValue() + new Nested().getValueInNested();
}
private int getValue() {
return 24;
}
private class Nested {
public int getValueInNested() {
// This is getValue() from Base, but would
// invokevirtual call the version from Derived?
return getValue();
}
}
}
public static class Derived extends Base {
// Let's redefine getValue() to see if it is picked by the
// invokevirtual from getValueInNested().
private int getValue() {
return 100;
}
}
}
Compiling this code with 11, we can see in the output of javap
that invokevirtual
is used both in foo()
and in getValueInNested()
:
public int foo();
descriptor: ()I
flags: (0x0001) ACC_PUBLIC
Code:
stack=4, locals=1, args_size=1
0: aload_0
// ** HERE **
1: invokevirtual #2 // Method getValue:()I
4: new #3 // class Test$Base$Nested
7: dup
8: aload_0
9: invokespecial #4 // Method Test$Base$Nested."<init>":(LTest$Base;)V
12: invokevirtual #5 // Method Test$Base$Nested.getValueInNested:()I
15: iadd
16: ireturn
public int getValueInNested();
descriptor: ()I
flags: (0x0001) ACC_PUBLIC
Code:
stack=1, locals=1, args_size=1
0: aload_0
1: getfield #1 // Field this$0:LTest$Base;
// ** HERE **
4: invokevirtual #3 // Method Test$Base.getValue:()I
7: ireturn
All of this is a bit confusing and raises some questions:
- Why
invokevirtual
is used to call private methods? Is there a use case where replacing it by aninvokespecial
would not be equivalent? - How does the call to
getValue()
inNested.getValueInNested()
not pick the method fromDerived
since it is called viainvokevirtual
?
Solution
This was done as part of https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/181: Nest-Based Access Control, so that the JVM can allow access to private methods from nested classes.
Before that change, the compiler would have to generate a package-protected synthetic method in the Base
class, which the nested class invokes. That synthetic method would in turn call the private method in the Base
class. The feature in Java 11 enhances the JVM to allow that without the compiler having to generate a synthetic method.
Concerning the point on whether invokevirtual
will call the method in the Derived
class, the answer is no. The private method is still not subject to method selection of the runtime class (this has never changed):
During execution of an
invokeinterface
orinvokevirtual
instruction, a method is selected with respect to (i) the run-time type of the object on the stack, and (ii) a method that was previously resolved by the instruction. The rules to select a method with respect to a class or interface C and a method mR are as follows:
- If mR is marked
ACC_PRIVATE
, then it is the selected method.
EDIT:
Based on the comment "Would it be valid to still use invokespecial if the private method is called from the method owner class and use invokevirtual if it is called from a nested class?"
As Holger mentioned, yes it is valid, but based on the JEP, I'm guessing a decision was made to switch to invokevirtual
for simplicity (I cannot confirm this though, it's just a guess):
With the change to the access rules, and with suitable adjustments to byte code rules, we can allow simplified rules for generating invocation bytecodes:
- invokespecial for private nestmate constructors,
- invokevirtual for private non-interface, nestmate instance methods,
- invokeinterface for private interface, nestmate instance methods; and
- invokestatic for private nestmate, static methods
Another interesting note from JDK-8197445 : Implementation of JEP 181: Nest-Based Access Control:
Traditionally,
invokespecial
is used to invokeprivate
members, thoughinvokevirtual
also has this capability. Rather than perturb the complex rules about supertypes enforced byinvokespecial
, we require invocations ofprivate
methods in a different class to useinvokevirtual
.
Answered By - M A
Answer Checked By - Dawn Plyler (JavaFixing Volunteer)