[FIXED] Is there any pitfall using mutable set when mapping two repositories by using @OneToMany

Issue

I have two repositories mapped by using @OneToMany notation. Let's say @OneToMany entity is A, and @ManyToOne entity is B. I keep mutableSetOf(B) in entity of A. After I map two of them I had to get first B after checking some properties. But while debugging I realized that order of them comes randomly at each time. I could not find this issue online. Is this thing I am having possible?

Solution

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.

Answered By - zan5959
Answer Checked By - Pedro (JavaFixing Volunteer)