Issue
I've a web application using the spring(4.2.x) artifacts spring-webmvc, spring-messaging, spring-websocket
I've the below @Enable* annotations in my spring config java class
@EnableWebMvc
@EnableWebSocketMessageBroker
@EnableAsync
@EnableMBeanExport
WebSocket is used for broadcasting messages to browser clients. And there are few async methods annotated with @Async
The application was working fine with spring version 4.2.0.RC3. But when I changed it to the GA release 4.2.0.RELEASE, I get the below exception on startup. If I remove @EnableAsync it works fine, but I need the async functionality.
org.springframework.beans.factory.NoUniqueBeanDefinitionException: No qualifying bean of type [org.springframework.core.task.TaskExecutor] is defined: expected single matching bean but found 4: clientOutboundChannelExecutor,messageBrokerTaskScheduler,clientInboundChannelExecutor,brokerChannelExecutor
org.springframework.beans.factory.support.DefaultListableBeanFactory.getBean(DefaultListableBeanFactory.java:366)
org.springframework.beans.factory.support.DefaultListableBeanFactory.getBean(DefaultListableBeanFactory.java:332)
org.springframework.scheduling.annotation.AsyncAnnotationBeanPostProcessor.setBeanFactory(AsyncAnnotationBeanPostProcessor.java:128)
org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.invokeAwareMethods(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:1597)
org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.initializeBean(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:1565)
org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.doCreateBean(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:545)
org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.createBean(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:482)
org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractBeanFactory$1.getObject(AbstractBeanFactory.java:305)
org.springframework.beans.factory.support.DefaultSingletonBeanRegistry.getSingleton(DefaultSingletonBeanRegistry.java:230)
org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractBeanFactory.doGetBean(AbstractBeanFactory.java:301)
org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractBeanFactory.getBean(AbstractBeanFactory.java:201)
org.springframework.context.support.PostProcessorRegistrationDelegate.registerBeanPostProcessors(PostProcessorRegistrationDelegate.java:228)
org.springframework.context.support.AbstractApplicationContext.registerBeanPostProcessors(AbstractApplicationContext.java:682)
org.springframework.context.support.AbstractApplicationContext.refresh(AbstractApplicationContext.java:522)
org.springframework.web.servlet.FrameworkServlet.configureAndRefreshWebApplicationContext(FrameworkServlet.java:667)
org.springframework.web.servlet.FrameworkServlet.initWebApplicationContext(FrameworkServlet.java:539)
org.springframework.web.servlet.FrameworkServlet.initServletBean(FrameworkServlet.java:493)
org.springframework.web.servlet.HttpServletBean.init(HttpServletBean.java:136)
Solution
One of your @Configuration
must implement AsyncConfigurer
to specify the particular TaskExecutor
for @Async
methods.
Otherwise it is in confuse which one to choose from the applicationContext
.
Even if it worked with RC3
it doesn't matter that it is correct, hence the bug has been fixed for GA
.
UPDATE
The source code in the AsyncAnnotationBeanPostProcessor
looks like:
Executor executorToUse = this.executor;
if (executorToUse == null) {
try {
// Search for TaskExecutor bean... not plain Executor since that would
// match with ScheduledExecutorService as well, which is unusable for
// our purposes here. TaskExecutor is more clearly designed for it.
executorToUse = beanFactory.getBean(TaskExecutor.class);
}
catch (NoUniqueBeanDefinitionException ex) {
try {
executorToUse = beanFactory.getBean(DEFAULT_TASK_EXECUTOR_BEAN_NAME, TaskExecutor.class);
}
catch (NoSuchBeanDefinitionException ex2) {
throw new IllegalStateException("More than one TaskExecutor bean exists within the context, " +
"and none is named 'taskExecutor'. Mark one of them as primary or name it " +
"'taskExecutor' (possibly as an alias); or specify the AsyncConfigurer interface " +
"and implement getAsyncExecutor() accordingly.", ex);
}
}
catch (NoSuchBeanDefinitionException ex) {
logger.debug("Could not find default TaskExecutor bean", ex);
// Giving up -> falling back to default executor within the advisor...
}
}
So, I guess before in between moving from RC3 to GA you have had a taskExecutor
bean on the matter.
As we see by you StackTrace there is such a bean already...
Answered By - Artem Bilan
Answer Checked By - Mildred Charles (JavaFixing Admin)